Foreman AI Research
Empirical evaluations and technical research from the Foreman AI team. We measure what matters: recall fidelity, extraction accuracy, and real-world construction plan intelligence.
Empirical Comparison of General-Purpose AI vs Domain-Tuned Plan Intelligence
This benchmark compares a state-of-the-art general-purpose LLM against Foreman AI when applied to real-world construction plan sets. Results reveal a consistent performance gap favoring domain-tuned intelligence.
Technical benchmark report — 136-Page Aspen Estate Plan Intelligence
A controlled evaluation on a complex, multi-wing 136-page architectural plan set across tiny-text evidence, geometry & spatial reasoning, and builder-risk coordination. Efficiency-adjusted result: Foreman AI 109.75 / 115, Perplexity Computer 105.75 / 115.
Nearly one million pages of real construction plans for AI training and evaluation
This publication introduces a dataset of 7,550 construction plan sets totaling 954,892 pages—the first large-scale, vector-native corpus enabling meaningful model training and benchmarking on professional construction documents.
Stay informed
We release benchmarks and technical publications as we validate new capabilities. Join the list to receive updates.
